The review summary says "If, for some reason, you haven't yet bought the NES version" which makes it sound like you feel it has been a pretty essential purchase in its NES incarnation, but then the game only gets 7/10 which doesn't really scream 'must buy'. Simply stating why its better than another version doesn't help me decide on it as an individial purchase it just tells me that if I do get it I should get this version. There's nothing to tell me why it gets the score it does or why I should or shouldn't consider investing in it, which, in my view at least, is why I would read a review. The bottom line is that after reading the review I have a firm idea that this is a better game than the NES version.but that's all. If you were reviewing another version of Super Mario Bros then that might be a reasonable assumption but Soloman's Key, while not being outright obscure, isn't exactly the sort of game that is known to the masses. Just because a game is already available doesn't mean people will necessarily know anything about it, least of all 'most' people.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |